Some specialists think that bitcoin will reach USD 100,000 per unit. If today it is at USD 9. 570, 20 and we buy for USD 100 million, we would have 10. 449, 10 currencies. If the quote reaches USD 50,000 per unit and we sell our position we will have 10,449. 10 x 50,000 = USD 522,455,121. 11. I remind you that when bitcoin was launched they gave it to you for pennies; that is to say, whoever bought this position when coins cost one dollar today is multimillionaire. If a central bank makes this suggested purchase and wins the bet, that profit could be distributed among the retirees in its retirement system, wouldn’t it?
Will the U. S. get out of the agreement with Iran? Will there be an open alliance between Saudi Arabia and Israel to attack Syria, Yemen and Iran? Will Russia enter the conflict? It may be that no South American president can answer these questions, that not even Rajoy himself has much idea about it, but the truth is that if we go to the stock exchange the shares of the arms companies have not stopped rising in the last 10 years, even quintupling. That is to say, buying shares of companies that manufacture arms assures you dividends, dividends that you can distribute among the retirees of your country at the end of the year.
You can also invest in the formation of productive enterprises, for example, in sheep farming in Bolivia, industrialize the cut to achieve phytosanitary accreditation and export to Russia. You invest USD 50 million and in three years you are invoicing USD 250 million. You can invest in alternative energy companies, solar panels, windmills and the like. Generate companies, empower them, make them productive and distribute their profits among retirees, and / or the retirees themselves are a kind of SEO of those companies. But wouldn’t it be much easier – a matter of not making an effort – to campaign and simply nullify or cut retirement?
But let’s not forget that when today’s retirees made up the economically active population, the situation was different. In other words, in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s, the state population was one, and what there is now is another. Today, in many countries the number of public officials is such that it is almost impossible not to have a friend or relative within the state apparatus who, to make matters worse, in general, does not produce wealth. So, if those who consume wealth without producing it increase, how can we expect something about it for retirees?
As in the previous case, I have not been able to read clear proposals, with singing and ringing numbers about the retirees, any “intelligent and beautiful” bill – like the missiles of Trump and his friend Macrón. To close with numbers, 15 years ago a cow gave you 30 liters of milk, today, in Santa Cruz de la Sierra a cow gets up to 90 liters. In other words, you can do more with less, that’s what technology is all about, not marches with banners. . . But if you don’t know how to make numbers, you won’t even know how to make letters, so I say.